“TOO MUCH DYNAMITE”: BUYER’S FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT CLAIM SURVIVES SELLER’S DEFENSE BASED ON CONTRACTUAL LIMITATIONS ON POST-CLOSING LIABILITY
Robert S. Reder & Zachary R. Ryan | 75 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 123 (2022) |
Chancery Court permits buyer to challenge allegedly fraudulent representations in purchase agreement, despite “remarkably robust” contractual provisions designed to shield seller and its affiliates from post-closing liability.
AUTHORS:
Robert S. Reder
Zachary R. Ryan